Zolton v. Rotter

32 N.W.2d 30, 321 Mich. 1, 1948 Mich. LEXIS 447
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedApril 5, 1948
DocketDocket No. 19, Calendar No. 43,571.
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 32 N.W.2d 30 (Zolton v. Rotter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zolton v. Rotter, 32 N.W.2d 30, 321 Mich. 1, 1948 Mich. LEXIS 447 (Mich. 1948).

Opinion

Boyles, J.

This is an automobile accident case tried by jury, resulting in a verdict of $10,000 damages for death of plaintiff's decedent. The principal contention upon which the defendant-appellant relies for reversal is that the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence in that the evidence failed to establish that it was the defendant’s automobile which was involved in the accident. The plaintiff relied on a multitude of facts and circumstances to identify the defendant’s automobile as the one involved, and the defendant relies on a claim that direct testimony proves the contrary. The locus of the case and the circumstances of the accident can best be indicated by the map included herewith.

Some of.the facts are undisputed. Plaintiff’s decedent, Dorothy Zolton, was 21 years of ago at the time of the accident, married, with a son 15 months old, both in good health. Her husband was in the armed forces overseas, and she had been employed at a forge plant, during part of the time since marriage. About 9:30 o’clock on the night of January 8, 1944, she started out from the Hilborn house on Paines road with two girl companions, Ruth and Phyllis Hilborn, Avalking north on the west side of Paines road, west of the center line and facing traffic, to go to the village of Shields a short distance *4 north. There was no sidewalk. Dorothy Zolton was nearest the center line, Ruth walked beside her close enough to touch her, and Phyllis a few steps behind them. There was plenty of room for northbound traffic to pass them on the east side of the 18-foot pavement. Ruth noticed the reflection of automobile lights approaching them from the south, looked around and saw an automobile coming behind them. No horn was sounded and she did not see the automobile again until after it struck Dorothy Zolton, who was hit by the left front of the automobile, thrown into the air and instantly killed. The automobile swerved back into the east lane of the pavement and did not stop or slow down but went on north and turned east at the stop light, onto Gratiot road. The accident occurred near the Weidman home, about one-fifth mile south of the intersection of Paines road and Gratiot road at the stop light. Ruth Hilborn saw the car as it went on, and testified that it looked like a black or real dark car, with two tail lights at the back, a license plate in the middle and a light above it. Ruth Hilborn, at that time 17 years of age, did not drive an automobile, could not tell the makes of cars, testified it looked like an old 1935 Buick, like a flat (perpendicular) trunk at the back, and thought it had four doors. When the accident was re-enacted a short time later she said the defendant’s car was not the one, but she also said she was not sure and that at night they all looked the same.

One Richard Rouse runs a garage and gasoline, pumps on Gratiot road about a block north and one’ block east of the place where the accident occurred. He knew the defendant and the defendant’s car, and testified it was a 1940 Oldsmobile maroon coupe; that at 9:45 on the night in question a 1940 Oldsmobile maroon coupe stopped in front of his pumps.

*5

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People of Michigan v. Kevin Scott Varner
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016
People of Michigan v. James Lynn Johnson
Michigan Court of Appeals, 2016
Thorn v. Mercy Memorial Hospital Corp.
761 N.W.2d 414 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 2008)
Nichol v. El Par Motor Sales
206 N.W.2d 790 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1973)
Villa v. Golich
201 N.W.2d 349 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1972)
Rex Paper Company v. Reichhold Chemicals, Inc.
252 F. Supp. 314 (W.D. Michigan, 1966)
Westfall v. Venton
137 N.W.2d 757 (Michigan Court of Appeals, 1965)
Woodfine v. Maier
338 P.2d 681 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1959)
Van Tassel v. Patterson
50 N.W.2d 113 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1951)
Siverling v. Lee
90 F. Supp. 659 (E.D. Michigan, 1950)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
32 N.W.2d 30, 321 Mich. 1, 1948 Mich. LEXIS 447, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zolton-v-rotter-mich-1948.