Zolotorofe v. Pearson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zolotorofe v. Pearson

5 A.D.2d 879, 172 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6616

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 17, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 879 (Zolotorofe v. Pearson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zolotorofe v. Pearson, 5 A.D.2d 879, 172 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Action by an employee of a tenant in a factory building against Brooklyn Yarn Dye Co., Inc., the owner of the building, Du-All Maintenance Corp., the general contractor hired by Brooklyn Yarn to remove certain boilers and boiler equipment from the building, and Arc Boiler & Welding Co., Inc., hired by Du-All to perform certain acetylene cutting work in connection therewith. The employee was injured when he fell through a floor weakened as the result of a fire coneededly caused by appellant's negligence. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the employee against Are Boiler and Du-All, and in favor of Brooklyn Yarn against the employee. Are Boiler appeals from so much of the judgment as is against it. Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Action by an employee of a tenant in a factory building against Brooklyn Yarn Dye Co., Inc., the owner of the building, Du-All Maintenance Corp., the general contractor hired by Brooklyn Yarn to remove certain boilers and boiler equipment from the building, and Arc Boiler & Welding Co., Inc., hired by Du-All to perform certain acetylene cutting work in connection therewith. The employee was injured when he fell through a floor weakened as the result of a fire coneededly caused by appellant's negligence. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the employee against Are Boiler and Du-All, and in favor of Brooklyn Yarn against the employee. Are Boiler appeals from so much of the judgment as is against it. Judgment insofar as appealed from unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion.

Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, Beldoek, Ughetta and Kleinfeld, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 879, 172 N.Y.S.2d 777, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zolotorofe-v-pearson-nyappdiv-1958.