Zoll v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
This text of 423 So. 2d 557 (Zoll v. Kentucky Fried Chicken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Zoll appeals a compensation order denying her claim for wage-loss benefits and attorney’s fees. We affirm.
Existence of permanent impairment within the AMA Guides is required for Zoll’s injury. Paradise Fruit Company v. Floyd,-So.2d-(Fla. 1st DCA 1982) [7 FLW 1899]. Compare Racz v. Chennault, Inc., 418 So.2d 413 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (remand for evidence applying Guides to psychiatric disability).
The facts of this case do not require a finding of bad faith within the meaning of Section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1981).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
423 So. 2d 557, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zoll-v-kentucky-fried-chicken-fladistctapp-1982.