Zoll v. Kentucky Fried Chicken

423 So. 2d 557, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28657
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 15, 1982
DocketNo. AL-10
StatusPublished

This text of 423 So. 2d 557 (Zoll v. Kentucky Fried Chicken) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zoll v. Kentucky Fried Chicken, 423 So. 2d 557, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28657 (Fla. Ct. App. 1982).

Opinion

MILLS, Judge.

Zoll appeals a compensation order denying her claim for wage-loss benefits and attorney’s fees. We affirm.

Existence of permanent impairment within the AMA Guides is required for Zoll’s injury. Paradise Fruit Company v. Floyd,-So.2d-(Fla. 1st DCA 1982) [7 FLW 1899]. Compare Racz v. Chennault, Inc., 418 So.2d 413 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982) (remand for evidence applying Guides to psychiatric disability).

The facts of this case do not require a finding of bad faith within the meaning of Section 440.34, Florida Statutes (1981).

AFFIRMED.

ROBERT P. SMITH, Jr., C.J., and McCORD, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Racz v. Chennault, Inc.
418 So. 2d 413 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 So. 2d 557, 1982 Fla. App. LEXIS 28657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zoll-v-kentucky-fried-chicken-fladistctapp-1982.