Zolezzi v. Kroll & Horowitz Furniture Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zolezzi v. Kroll & Horowitz Furniture Co.

216 A.D. 719

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1926

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 216 A.D. 719 (Zolezzi v. Kroll & Horowitz Furniture Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zolezzi v. Kroll & Horowitz Furniture Co., 216 A.D. 719 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

Opinions

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Rich, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur; Jaycox, J., reads for reversal as to defendant Brown; Kelly, P. J., concurs with Jaycox, J., and also votes to reverse upon the ground that at the time of the creation of the nuisance or thereafter the said defendant was not in possession of the premises, and there is no evidence that she had knowledge of the existence of the alleged nuisance.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order denying new trial affirmed, with costs. Rich, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur; Jaycox, J., reads for reversal as to defendant Brown; Kelly, P. J., concurs with Jaycox, J., and also votes to reverse upon the ground that at the time of the creation of the nuisance or thereafter the said defendant was not in possession of the premises, and there is no evidence that she had knowledge of the existence of the alleged nuisance.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D. 719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zolezzi-v-kroll-horowitz-furniture-co-nyappdiv-1926.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack