Zohar v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.

769 So. 2d 1047, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4807, 2000 WL 484726
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 26, 2000·No. No. 3D99-1420·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Wolk v. Lamar Life Ins. Co., 202 So.2d 617, 619 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967)(“good health” clauses conditions precedent that must be satisfied before policy becomes effective); Life Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Cichowlas, 659 So.2d 1333 (Fla. 4th DCA)(same), review denied, 666 So.2d 142 (Fla.1995).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zohar v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co., 769 So. 2d 1047, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 4807, 2000 WL 484726 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

769 So. 2d 1047 (Zohar v. Paul Revere Life Insurance Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Life Ins. Co. of N. Am. v. Cichowlas
659 So. 2d 1333 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1995)
Wolk v. Lamar Life Insurance
202 So. 2d 617 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)