Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. v. Patriarch Partners, LLC

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 2, 2022·No. 1:17-cv-00307·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ----------------------------------------------------------x : ZOHAR CDO 2003-1, LTD.; ZOHAR II : 2005-1, LTD.; and ZOHAR III, LTD., : : Plaintiffs & Counterclaim : Defendants : v. : : PATRIARCH PARTNERS, LLC; : PATRIARCH PARTNERS VIII, LLC; : PATRIARCH PARTNERS XIV, LLC; : PATRIARCH PARTNERS XV, LLC; : OCTALUNA LLC; OCTALUNA II LLC; : OCTALUNA III LLC; ARK II CLO 2001-1, : LLC; ARK INVESTMENT PARTNERS II, : L.P.; and LYNN TILTON, : No. 1:17-cv-00307 : Defendants, Counterclaimants : & Third-Party Plaintiffs : : v. : : MBIA INSURANCE CORPORATION; : MBIA, INC.; ALVAREZ & MARSAL : ZOHAR MANAGEMENT, LLC; U.S. BANK, : N.A.; CREDIT VALUE PARTNERS, LP, : HALCYON CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LP, : COÖPERATIEVE RABOBANK U.A., and : VÄRDE PARTNERS, INC. : Third-Party Defendants : ----------------------------------------------------------x STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR THE EXCHANGE OF CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION The Court having found that good cause exists for issuance of an appropriately tailored confidentiality order governing the pre-trial phase of this action, and Defendants, Counterclaimants & Third-Party Plaintiffs, on the one hand, and U.S. Bank N.A., on the other (collectively, the “Parties” and, individually, each a “Party”) having stipulated to the following provisions, it is hereby ORDERED that any person subject to this Protective Order—including

without limitation the parties to this action, their attorneys, representatives, agents, experts and consultants, all third-parties providing discovery in this action, and all other interested persons with actual or constructive notice of this Order—shall adhere to the following terms, upon pain of contempt: Discovery Materials May be Designated as Confidential 1) Any person subject to this Protective Order who receives from any other person any “Discovery Material” (i.e., information of any kind provided in the course of discovery in this action) that is designated as “Confidential” pursuant to the terms of this Protective Order (hereinafter “Confidential Discovery Material”) shall not disclose such Confidential Discovery

Material to anyone else, except as expressly permitted hereunder. 2) The person producing any given Discovery Material may designate as “Confidential” any material or portion thereof that contains any category of information given confidential status by the federal courts, including, but not limited to, non-public business, commercial, financial or personal information, the public disclosure of which is either restricted by law or would likely, in the good faith opinion of the producing party, seriously harm the producing person’s business, commercial, financial, or personal interests or cause the producing person to violate his, her, or its privacy or confidentiality obligations to others. 3) With respect to Confidential Discovery Material other than deposition transcripts and exhibits, the producing person or that person’s counsel may designate such Discovery Materials as “Confidential” by stamping or otherwise clearly marking as “Confidential” the Discovery Materials in a manner that will not interfere with legibility or audibility. 4) With respect to deposition transcripts or exhibits, a producing person or that

person’s counsel may designate such documents or portions thereof as “Confidential” either by (a) indicating on the record during the deposition, or (b) notifying the reporter and counsel of record, in writing, within thirty (30) days after receipt of a final copy of the deposition’s transcript, of the specific pages and lines of the transcript and/or the specific exhibits that are to be designated Confidential, in which case all counsel receiving the transcript will be responsible for marking the copies of the designated transcript or exhibit (as the case may be), in their possession or under their control as directed by the producing person or that person’s counsel by the reporter. Prior to the termination of the aforementioned thirty-day period, the entire deposition transcript and all exhibits thereto will be treated as if they had been designated Confidential.

5) If at any time prior to the trial of this action a producing person realizes that some portion(s) of Discovery Material that she, he, or it had previously produced without designation should be designated as Confidential, she, he or it may so designate by so apprising all parties of the Confidential Discovery Material in writing. Such designated portion(s) of the Discovery Material will thereafter be deemed to be and treated as Confidential under the terms of this Protective Order. Who May Receive Confidential Materials 6) No person subject to this Protective Order, other than the producing person, shall disclose any Confidential Discovery Material to any other person whomsoever, except to: a) the Parties to this action, their insurers, and counsel to their insurers; b) counsel retained specifically for this action, including any paralegal, clerical or other assistant employed by such counsel and assigned to this matter; c) outside vendors or service providers (such as copy-service providers and document- management consultants, graphic production services or other litigation support services)

that counsel hire and assign to this matter, including computer service personnel performing duties in relation to a computerized litigation system; d) any mediator or arbitrator that the Parties engage in this matter or that this Court appoints, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; e) as to any document, its author, its addressee, and any other person indicated on the face of the document as having received a copy; f) any witness who counsel for a Party in good faith believes may be called to testify at trial or deposition in this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-

Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; g) any person retained by a Party to serve as an expert witness or consultant or otherwise provide specialized advice to counsel in connection with this action, provided such person has first executed a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto; h) stenographers and video technicians engaged to transcribe or record depositions conducted in this action; i) this Court, including any appellate court, and the court reporters and support personnel for the same; and j) any other person agreed to by the Parties. 7) Prior to any disclosure of any Confidential Discovery Material to any person referred to in subparagraphs 6(d), (f) or (g), above, such person shall be provided by counsel with a copy of this Protective Order and shall sign a Non-Disclosure Agreement in the form annexed as an Exhibit hereto stating that the person has read this Protective Order and agrees to be bound

by its terms. Filing Confidential Materials in the Action 8) Any Party who objects to any designation of confidentiality may at any time prior to the trial of this action serve upon counsel for the designating person and all other parties a written notice stating with particularity the grounds of the objection. If agreement cannot be reached promptly, all affected persons or Parties may bring the dispute before this Court. 9) Any person or Party who requests additional limits on disclosure (such as an “attorneys’ eyes only” designation reserved for extraordinary circumstances) may at any time prior to the trial of this action serve upon counsel for all parties a written notice stating with particularity

the grounds for the request. If agreement cannot be reached promptly, all affected persons or Parties may bring the dispute before this Court. 10) A Party may be requested to produce Discovery Material that is subject to contractual or other obligations of confidentiality owed to a third-party.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. v. Patriarch Partners, LLC, (S.D.N.Y. 2022).

Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. v. Patriarch Partners, LLC (Zohar CDO 2003-1, Ltd. v. Patriarch Partners, LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lugosch v. Pyramid Co. of Onondaga
435 F.3d 110 (Second Circuit, 2006)