Zoerman v. Titan Insurance Company

781 N.W.2d 576, 486 Mich. 912
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedMay 14, 2010
Docket140111
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 781 N.W.2d 576 (Zoerman v. Titan Insurance Company) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zoerman v. Titan Insurance Company, 781 N.W.2d 576, 486 Mich. 912 (Mich. 2010).

Opinion

781 N.W.2d 576 (2010)

Kevin ZOERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and Brandy Zoerman, Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 140111. COA No. 285105.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 14, 2010.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from this Court's order denying defendant's application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissent from the order denying defendant's motion for reconsideration of our earlier order denying leave to appeal in Detroit Medical Ctr. v. Titan Ins. Co., 485 Mich. 1008, 775 N.W.2d 755 (2009) (reported below: 284 Mich.App 490, 775 N.W.2d 151 [2009]), recon. den. ___ Mich. ___, 781 N.W.2d 574 (2010).

CORRIGAN, J., joins the statement of MARKMAN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In Re Cv
781 N.W.2d 576 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
781 N.W.2d 576, 486 Mich. 912, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zoerman-v-titan-insurance-company-mich-2010.