Zoerman v. Titan Insurance Company

781 N.W.2d 576, 486 Mich. 912
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 14, 2010·No. 140111·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

781 N.W.2d 576 (2010)

Kevin ZOERMAN, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
TITAN INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant-/Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant, and Brandy Zoerman, Third-Party Defendant.

Docket No. 140111. COA No. 285105.

Supreme Court of Michigan.

May 14, 2010.

Order

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 20, 2009 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the question presented should be reviewed by this Court.

MARKMAN, J. (dissenting).

I respectfully dissent from this Court's order denying defendant's application for leave to appeal for the reasons set forth in my dissent from the order denying defendant's motion for reconsideration of our earlier order denying leave to appeal in Detroit Medical Ctr. v. Titan Ins. Co., 485 Mich. 1008, 775 N.W.2d 755 (2009) (reported below: 284 Mich.App 490, 775 N.W.2d 151 [2009]), recon. den. ___ Mich. ___, 781 N.W.2d 574 (2010).

CORRIGAN, J., joins the statement of MARKMAN, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zoerman v. Titan Insurance Company, 781 N.W.2d 576, 486 Mich. 912 (Mich. 2010).

781 N.W.2d 576 (Zoerman v. Titan Insurance Company) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

In Re Cv
781 N.W.2d 576 (Michigan Supreme Court, 2010)