Zock v. Miller

505 So. 2d 18, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 944
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 7, 1987·No. 85-2373, 85-2374, 85-2806 and 86-174·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

505 So.2d 18 (1987)

Mouhamed ZOCK, As Personal Representative of the Estates of Hassan Zock and Heide Zock, Deceased, Appellant,
v.
Lloyd R. MILLER, M.D., University of Miami, and Dade County Public Health Trust D/B/a Jackson Memorial Hospital, Appellees.

Nos. 85-2373, 85-2374, 85-2806 and 86-174.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Third District.

April 7, 1987.

*19 Gerald E. Rosser, Miami, for appellant.

Robert A. Ginsburg, Co. Atty. and Stephen J. Keating, Asst. Co. Atty., Fowler, White, Burnett, Hurley, Banick & Strickroot and Steven E. Stark, Miami, for appellees.

Before HUBBART, FERGUSON and JORGENSON, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In Florida a psychiatrist appointed by the court to examine a criminally accused enjoys quasi-judicial immunity from liability where he, based on an examination, erroneously determines that the accused, if released on bail, would pose no harm to others. See Fisher v. Payne, 93 Fla. 1085, 113 So. 378 (1927); Cawthon v. Coffer, 264 So.2d 873 (Fla. 2d DCA 1972). See also Seibel v. Kemble, 63 Haw. 516, 631 P.2d 173 (1981) (reasons underlying judicial immunity apply to court-appointed psychiatrists).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zock v. Miller, 505 So. 2d 18, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 944 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

505 So. 2d 18 (Zock v. Miller) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cunningham v. Florida Department of Children & Families
782 So. 2d 913 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2001)
Bradford v. Metropolitan Dade County
522 So. 2d 96 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)