Zmudczynski v. Reichle
This text of 225 N.W. 932 (Zmudczynski v. Reichle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is a bill to set aside a judgment in summary proceedings, on the ground that one of the defendants therein, Stanley Zmudczynski, had not been served with process.
It would be of no benefit to the profession to set up the evidence. We have carefully considered it, and agree with the chancellor that defendant was personally served with process, appeared in the proceedings by his attorney, and pleaded to the issue.
Decree dismissing bill is affirmed, with costs.
NORTH, C.J., and FELLOWS, WIEST, CLARK, McDONALD, POTTER, and SHARPE, JJ., concurred. *Page 485
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
225 N.W. 932, 247 Mich. 484, 1929 Mich. LEXIS 775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zmudczynski-v-reichle-mich-1929.