Zlotnick v. Greenfeld

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Zlotnick v. Greenfeld

90 N.Y.S. 1086

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1904

StatusPublished

This text of 90 N.Y.S. 1086 (Zlotnick v. Greenfeld) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zlotnick v. Greenfeld, 90 N.Y.S. 1086 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought against the alleged indorsers upon a check made by the firm of Panitz Bros., and cashed for them by the plaintiff. The answer was a general denial. There was no evidence in the case that the defendants ever indorsed the check in question, nor was there evidence of presentment for payment to the bank upon which it was drawn.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought against the alleged indorsers upon a check made by the firm of Panitz Bros., and cashed for them by the plaintiff. The answer was a general denial. There was no evidence in the case that the defendants ever indorsed the check in question, nor was there evidence of presentment for payment to the bank upon which it was drawn.

Judgment reversed. New trial ordered, with costs to the appellants to abide the event.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

90 N.Y.S. 1086, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zlotnick-v-greenfeld-nyappterm-1904.