Zlotlow v. Zlotlow

285 A.D. 884, 137 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5991
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 23, 1955·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

In view of the fact that defendant has appeared for examination and produced the books and records required by the order of the court, we think that the motion to permit a discovery and inspection of the books and records of defendant’s companies should not have been granted. The question of defendant’s financial condition is now before an Official Referee for testimony and report. If the Referee deems it advisable, he may order such discovery and inspection. The order should accordingly be reversed and the motion denied. Present — Peck, P. J., Cohn, Callahan, Bastow and Rabin, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zlotlow v. Zlotlow, 285 A.D. 884, 137 N.Y.S.2d 860, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5991 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

285 A.D. 884 (Zlotlow v. Zlotlow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bruno v. Green Bus Lines, Inc.
22 Misc. 2d 194 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Rizzuto v. Telesca
19 Misc. 2d 871 (New York Supreme Court, 1959)