Zitnansky v. International Fidelity Insurance

Federal Circuit

Zitnansky v. International Fidelity Insurance

178 F. App'x 11

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedApril 4, 2006

DocketNo. 2006-1246

StatusPublished

This text of 178 F. App'x 11 (Zitnansky v. International Fidelity Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zitnansky v. International Fidelity Insurance, 178 F. App'x 11 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jo Ann Zitnansky and Jaro Zitnansky (the Zitnanskys) respond to this court’s order directing them to show cause why their appeal should not be transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.

The Zitnanskys sued the International Fidelity Insurance Company in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York, apparently asserting breach of contract and constitutional arguments. The district court dismissed the action as barred by res judicata. The Zitnanskys appealed, seeking review by this court.

This case clearly does not fall within this court’s jurisdiction. 28 U.S.C. § 1295. In their response, the Zitnanskys make arguments concerning the merits of their case but not concerning why we should not transfer the appeal.

Accordingly,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

The appeal is transferred to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1631.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI