Ziskind v. Hart

731 So. 2d 796, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5138, 1999 WL 233426
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 21, 1999
DocketNo. 99-173
StatusPublished

This text of 731 So. 2d 796 (Ziskind v. Hart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ziskind v. Hart, 731 So. 2d 796, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5138, 1999 WL 233426 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Having reviewed the briefs and the record, we conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering its order granting the former wife’s motion [797]*797for temporary attorney’s fees and costs. Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Levy v. Levy, 713 So.2d 1025 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998). We therefore affirm the trial court’s order.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Canakaris v. Canakaris
382 So. 2d 1197 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1980)
Levy v. Levy
713 So. 2d 1025 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
731 So. 2d 796, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 5138, 1999 WL 233426, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziskind-v-hart-fladistctapp-1999.