Ziserman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.

88 A. 80, 241 Pa. 13, 1913 Pa. LEXIS 728

• Court: Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
• Decided: May 5, 1913
• Docket: Appeal, No. 96
• Status: Published

Opinion

Per Curiam,

The first, second, third and fourth assignments of error cannot be considered, as no exception was taken to the charge: Lindsay v. Dutton, 227 Pa. 208. Plaintiff’s sixth point was properly refused. The duty that rested upon the defendant was the exercise of due care under the circumstances — not greater than they required.

Judgment affirmed.