Zirino v. Diamond

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zirino v. Diamond

259 A.D.2d 443, 687 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3235

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1999

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 259 A.D.2d 443 (Zirino v. Diamond) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zirino v. Diamond, 259 A.D.2d 443, 687 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3235 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

Opinion

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority dated April 25, 1997, dismissing petitioner from his position as a maintenance worker, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the penalty of dismissal and remand the matter to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Louis York, J.], entered January 23, 1998), is otherwise disposed of by confirming the remainder of the determination, without costs.

Respondent’s finding that petitioner improperly solicited money from a tenant to do repair work in the tenant’s apartment is supported by substantial evidence, including, in particular, the testimony of the tenant from whom petitioner solicited money. We find no basis for disturbing respondent’s credibility findings. However, the penalty of dismissal of this 17-year employee with only two prior minor infractions is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock our sense of fairness, and we accordingly remand to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Determination of respondent New York City Housing Authority dated April 25, 1997, dismissing petitioner from his position as a maintenance worker, unanimously modified, on the facts, to vacate the penalty of dismissal and remand the matter to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty, and the proceeding brought pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, New York County [Louis York, J.], entered January 23, 1998), is otherwise disposed of by confirming the remainder of the determination, without costs.

Respondent’s finding that petitioner improperly solicited money from a tenant to do repair work in the tenant’s apartment is supported by substantial evidence, including, in particular, the testimony of the tenant from whom petitioner solicited money. We find no basis for disturbing respondent’s credibility findings. However, the penalty of dismissal of this 17-year employee with only two prior minor infractions is so disproportionate to the offense as to shock our sense of fairness, and we accordingly remand to respondent for imposition of a lesser penalty. Concur — Nardelli, J. P., Lerner, Mazzarelli and Saxe, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

259 A.D.2d 443, 687 N.Y.S.2d 349, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zirino-v-diamond-nyappdiv-1999.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack