Zipper v. McCutcheon
160 A. 634, 109 N.J.L. 274, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 332
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Teenchaed, Lloyd, Case, Donges, Van Buskiek, Kays, Hetfield, Deae, Wells, Keeney, JJ. 11.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zipper v. McCutcheon, 160 A. 634, 109 N.J.L. 274, 1932 N.J. LEXIS 332 (N.J. 1932).
160 A. 634 (Zipper v. McCutcheon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. Heller
84 A.2d 485 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)