Zipp v. Uhland Hain No. 16
This text of 30 Ill. App. 280 (Zipp v. Uhland Hain No. 16) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
.This suit was commenced before a justice of the peace. On appeal to the Circuit Court, that court gave leave to amend by adding a co-plaintiff. This was warranted by the practice act and McDowell v. Town, 90 Ill. 859. On the conflicting evidence the verdict of the jury is final, and the instructions asked by the defendant, that the contract for the renting of stands at a picnic was void because the picnic was, on Sunday, come with a poor grace from one who does not intend to obey the law, and are not based upon any evidence that the picnic was in this State.
For aught that this record shows it may have been in an adjoining State, in which neither the Circuit nor this court has any judicial knowledge that Sunday is regarded.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 Ill. App. 280, 1888 Ill. App. LEXIS 273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zipp-v-uhland-hain-no-16-illappct-1889.