Zipkin v. Hendler

182 A. 843, 116 N.J.L. 137, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 203
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided January 31, 1936·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered per curiam in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Case, Bodine, Heher, Perskie, Hetfield, Dear, Wells, WolfsKeil, Bafferty, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zipkin v. Hendler, 182 A. 843, 116 N.J.L. 137, 1936 N.J. LEXIS 203 (N.J. 1936).

182 A. 843 (Zipkin v. Hendler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cermak v. Hertz Corp.
147 A.2d 800 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1958)