Ziotas v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC
962 A.2d 796, 290 Conn. 903, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 250
This text of 962 A.2d 796 (Ziotas v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ziotas v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC, 962 A.2d 796, 290 Conn. 903, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 250 (Colo. 2009).
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 287 (AC 28260), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the Connecticut wage statute, General Statutes § 31-71a, applied to the plaintiffs year-end bonus?”
did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ziotas v. Reardon Law Firm, PC
997 A.2d 453 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
962 A.2d 796, 290 Conn. 903, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 250, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziotas-v-the-reardon-law-firm-pc-conn-2009.