Ziotas v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Ziotas v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC

962 A.2d 796, 290 Conn. 903, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 250

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided January 7, 2009·No. SC 18292·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 287 (AC 28260), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the Connecticut wage statute, General Statutes § 31-71a, applied to the plaintiffs year-end bonus?”

KATZ, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 111 Conn. App. 287 (AC 28260), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court improperly conclude that the Connecticut wage statute, General Statutes § 31-71a, applied to the plaintiffs year-end bonus?”

KATZ, J.,

did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Ziotas v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC, 962 A.2d 796, 290 Conn. 903, 2009 Conn. LEXIS 250 (Colo. 2009).

Pincite

962 A.2d 796 (Ziotas v. THE REARDON LAW FIRM, PC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related