Zion Resurrection Church, Inc. v. Neerg Second Corp.

297 A.D.2d 805, 748 N.Y.2d 68, 748 N.Y.S.2d 68, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8870

This text of 297 A.D.2d 805 (Zion Resurrection Church, Inc. v. Neerg Second Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zion Resurrection Church, Inc. v. Neerg Second Corp., 297 A.D.2d 805, 748 N.Y.2d 68, 748 N.Y.S.2d 68, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8870 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

When a party’s failure to comply with disclosure orders is willful, deliberate, and contumacious, it is within the trial court’s discretion to dismiss that party’s pleading (see Kihl v Pfeffer, 94 NY2d 118, 122; Abouzeid v Cadogan, 291 AD2d 423; Lones v Lampeas, 270 AD2d 317). Here, the plaintiff repeatedly failed to comply with the Supreme Court’s directives regarding disclosure. Accordingly, the Supreme Court providently exercised its discretion in dismissing the complaint.

In light of our determination, we need not reach the plaintiff’s remaining contentions. Feuerstein, J.P., Smith, Friedmann and Adams, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kihl v. Pfeffer
722 N.E.2d 55 (New York Court of Appeals, 1999)
Lones v. Lampeas
270 A.D.2d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
Abouzeid v. Cadogan
291 A.D.2d 423 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
297 A.D.2d 805, 748 N.Y.2d 68, 748 N.Y.S.2d 68, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8870, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zion-resurrection-church-inc-v-neerg-second-corp-nyappdiv-2002.