ZIOLKOWSKI, KENNETH v. HAN-TEK, INC.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

ZIOLKOWSKI, KENNETH v. HAN-TEK, INC.

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedSeptember 26, 2014

DocketCA 14-00090

StatusPublished

This text of ZIOLKOWSKI, KENNETH v. HAN-TEK, INC. (ZIOLKOWSKI, KENNETH v. HAN-TEK, INC.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

ZIOLKOWSKI, KENNETH v. HAN-TEK, INC., (N.Y. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department

990 CA 14-00090 PRESENT: SCUDDER, P.J., PERADOTTO, CARNI, AND VALENTINO, JJ.

KENNETH ZIOLKOWSKI, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

V ORDER

HAN-TEK, INC. AND ZYNERGY SOLUTIONS, INC., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

LAW OFFICES OF DESTIN C. SANTACROSE, BUFFALO (ERIN K. SKUCE OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT HAN-TEK, INC.

TREVETT CRISTO SALZER & ANDOLINA, P.C., ROCHESTER (DANIEL P. DEBOLT OF COUNSEL), FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT ZYNERGY SOLUTIONS, INC.

LAW OFFICE OF THOMAS C. PARES, BUFFALO (THOMAS C. PARES OF COUNSEL), FOR PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT.

Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie County (Timothy J. Drury, J.), entered September 5, 2013. The order, among other things, denied defendants’ motions for summary judgment.

It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.

Entered: September 26, 2014 Frances E. Cafarell Clerk of the Court

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI