Zinke v. . Hipkins
135 N.E. 899, 233 N.Y. 516, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 918
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: His cock, Ch. J., Hogan, Cardozo, Pound, Crane and Andrews, JJ. Absent: McLaughlin, J.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zinke v. . Hipkins, 135 N.E. 899, 233 N.Y. 516, 1922 N.Y. LEXIS 918 (N.Y. 1922).
135 N.E. 899 (Zinke v. . Hipkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Porter
148 F.2d 566 (Fifth Circuit, 1945)
Matter of Kaplan v. Peyser
7 N.E.2d 21 (New York Court of Appeals, 1937)