Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Zink v. Kaplan

Zink v. Kaplan

631 So. 2d 370, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 778, 1994 WL 35503
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 9, 1994·No. No. 93-2168·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We grant the Petition for Writ of Mandamus, and direct the respondent, the Honorable Stanton S. Kaplan, to rule on Petitioner’s Motion for Post Conviction Relief, under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850, and supplement thereto, dated May 21, 1992, and November 20, 1992, respectively. Such ruling shall be made within 30 days of this opinion.

If the State of Florida wishes to file any response to petitioner’s trial court motions, for which the state has already received at [371]*371least 60 days of extensions, the state must do so forthwith, to allow respondent to comply within the time allowed.

A copy of respondent’s ruling shall be filed in this court immediately upon entry.

In anticipation that the respondent will comply without further directive, we withhold formal issuance of the writ.

POLEN, FARMER and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zink v. Kaplan, 631 So. 2d 370, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 778, 1994 WL 35503 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

631 So. 2d 370 (Zink v. Kaplan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.