Zink v. California State Board of Equalization
499 U.S. 903, 111 S. Ct. 1100
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Zink v. California State Board of Equalization. Read the opinion of the Court — 499 U.S. 974 →
Opinions
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied. Petitioner is allowed until March 25, 1991, within which to pay the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) and to submit a petition in compliance with Rule 33 of the Rules of this Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zink v. California State Board of Equalization, 499 U.S. 903, 111 S. Ct. 1100 (1991).
499 U.S. 903 (Zink v. California State Board of Equalization) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Theodis Brown v. Herald Co., Inc., Etc
464 U.S. 928 (Supreme Court, 1983)