Zimmerman's Estate

9 Pa. D. & C. 564, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 101
CourtPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Schuylkill County
DecidedJune 6, 1927
StatusPublished

This text of 9 Pa. D. & C. 564 (Zimmerman's Estate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Pennsylvania Orphans' Court, Schuylkill County primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimmerman's Estate, 9 Pa. D. & C. 564, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 101 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1927).

Opinion

Wilhelm, P. J.,

This is the petition of George W. Zimmerman and Nelson H. Zimmerman, administrators of the estate of Rebecca J. Zimmerman, deceased, praying the court to authorize them, as administrators, under the provisions of the Revised Price Act of 1917, to expose at public sale the real estate described in the petition.

The petition sets out that the assessed valuation of the real estate is $1800; that the house situated thereon is in need of repair, and there are no assets in the estate of the decedent to defray the expenses of repair; that there are two granddaughters of the decedent, and a grandson, who are minors and have no guardian; and that each of said minors has a one-eighty-eighth interest in said real estate, and that it would be to the interest and advantage of said minors, as well as the other parties in interest, to expose to public sale said real estate.

The petition does not set forth that it is necessary to sell the real estate for the payment of debts, and if it did contain such an allegation, the sale could not be made under the Revised Price Act, which has no reference to or connection with the administration of decedents’ estates. It was not passed for that purpose and cannot in any sense be regarded as pari materia with the Fiduciaries Act of 1917.

Administrators have no interest in the land of their decedent except in such cases as are given them by statute.

The primary duty of an administrator is limited to personal property as indicated by the act of assembly, the oath he is required to take and the condition of the bond he files. In case it becomes necessary to sell real estate for the payment of debts, the law permits him to petition the court for that purpose. He has no authority to sell real estate for any other than administrative purposes, and this has always been the policy of the law; and the Revised Price Act, which in large measure is a codification of the original Price Act, does not give to administrators power to petition for a sale of real estate because such a sale would be for the best interest of the parties concerned.

It will be noted that this is an attempt by administrators to sell the land of minors who have no guardian, and who, therefore, could not be bound by an order of sale, and an attempt to sell the land of adults by and with their consent under the Price Act, which does not give administrators, in their administrative capacity, the authority to sell the land of their decedent.

A sale made under this petition would not convey good title; therefore, should not be authorized: Spencer v. Jennings, 123 Pa. 184.

The petition is dismissed. From M. M. Burke, Shenandoah, Pa.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spencer v. Jennings
16 A. 426 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1889)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
9 Pa. D. & C. 564, 1927 Pa. Dist. & Cnty. Dec. LEXIS 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmermans-estate-paorphctschuyl-1927.