Zimmermann v. Jewett

19 Abb. N. Cas. 459
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedMay 15, 1886
StatusPublished

This text of 19 Abb. N. Cas. 459 (Zimmermann v. Jewett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimmermann v. Jewett, 19 Abb. N. Cas. 459 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1886).

Opinion

The court held that the attempted irrevocable character of the arrangementbeing separable, the arrangement was legal as assenting stockholders did not object : and the power to revoke could only be exercised by those who had assented. The court distinguished Hafer v. N. Y., Lake Erie & Western R. R. Co., above cited [p. 454], as a case where the right “ was conferred on a party not otherwise interested in the road,” and the principal object of the contract was illegal, and one not a party to it was entitled to an injunction because its effect was to remove the control of the company entirely away from the stockholders.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
19 Abb. N. Cas. 459, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmermann-v-jewett-nysuperctnyc-1886.