Zimmerman v. Zimmerman
14 N.Y.S. 444, 26 Abb. N. Cas. 366
Opinion
Section 1773 provides for an order requiring the husband to show cause why he should not be punished for his failure to make the payment of alimony. There is no provision how that order shall be served, and I think the rule as laid down in Pitt v. Davison, 37 N. Y. 235, allows the order to be served upon the attorney for the party where it does not appear that final judgment has been entered. I think the service of the order complied with the provisions of the Code. Motion denied, with $10 costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zimmerman v. Zimmerman, 14 N.Y.S. 444, 26 Abb. N. Cas. 366 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).
14 N.Y.S. 444 (Zimmerman v. Zimmerman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Macdermid v. Macdermid
73 A.2d 315 (Supreme Court of Vermont, 1950)
Grant v. Greene
121 A.D. 756 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1907)
Harney v. Harney
110 A.D. 20 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1905)
Christensen Engineering Co. v. Westinghouse Air Brake Co.
135 F. 774 (Second Circuit, 1905)
Rochester Lamp Co. v. Brigham
72 N.Y. St. Rep. 467 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1896)