Zimmerman v. Zimmerman

New York Supreme Court

Zimmerman v. Zimmerman

14 N.Y.S. 444, 26 Abb. N. Cas. 366

CourtNew York Supreme Court

DecidedFebruary 15, 1891

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 14 N.Y.S. 444 (Zimmerman v. Zimmerman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. Zimmerman, 14 N.Y.S. 444, 26 Abb. N. Cas. 366 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1891).

Pincite

Opinion

Ingraham, J.

Section 1773 provides for an order requiring the husband to show cause why he should not be punished for his failure to make the payment of alimony. There is no provision how that order shall be served, and I think the rule as laid down in Pitt v. Davison, 37 N. Y. 235, allows the order to be served upon the attorney for the party where it does not appear that final judgment has been entered. I think the service of the order complied with the provisions of the Code. Motion denied, with $10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ingraham, J.

Section 1773 provides for an order requiring the husband to show cause why he should not be punished for his failure to make the payment of alimony. There is no provision how that order shall be served, and I think the rule as laid down in Pitt v. Davison, 37 N. Y. 235, allows the order to be served upon the attorney for the party where it does not appear that final judgment has been entered. I think the service of the order complied with the provisions of the Code. Motion denied, with $10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

14 N.Y.S. 444, 26 Abb. N. Cas. 366, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-zimmerman-nysupct-1891.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack