Zimmerman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Zimmerman v. State

1943 OK CR 92, 141 P.2d 123, 77 Okla. Crim. 266, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 34

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 1, 1943

DocketNo. A-10299.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1943 OK CR 92 (Zimmerman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. State, 1943 OK CR 92, 141 P.2d 123, 77 Okla. Crim. 266, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 34 (Okla. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

A. G. Zimmerman and J. W. Mc-Curley, members of the school hoard of school district No. 36 in Woods county, and both being Jehovah’s Witnesses, were charged by information filed in the county court of Woods county with unlawfully hindering and refusing to assist the teacher of said school district in the enforcement of an appropriate flag ceremonial in said public school, by reinstating certain pupils after they were suspended from said public school by the teacher for persistent violation of the school regulation in respect to the flag ceremonial as formulated by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction in Bulletin Not 146. The defendants were tried, convicted and sentenced to- pay a fine of $150 each.

Certain pupils of the school district of which the defendants were respectively the director and clerk of the school board were suspended from school for refusing to participate in the flag salute ceremony. The children refused to salute the flag because it conflicted with their religious beliefs. A controversy arose and the teacher, *268 according to Ms testimony, submitted the matter to the school board “to decide whether I was right in suspending the children, or whether the children were right.” The two defendants, constituting a majority of the school board, decided to reinstate the pupils in school who had been expelled for refusing to salute the flag and instructed the teacher' to proceed with the flag ceremonial for those who wished to participate, but to excuse those children from participating who did not wish to do so- because it conflicted with their religious beliefs:.

Although this conviction arises in a different manner from the convictions discussed by this court in the cases of Pendley v. State, 77 Okla Cr. 259, 141 P. 2d 118, and Carter-Mort v. State, 77 Okla. Cr. 269, 141 P. 2d 122, they are all dependent upon a construction of the statute empowering the State Superintendent to prescribe a proper ceremonial for teaching respect to the American flag. If, as has been held by us in two decisions above referred to, pupils with conscientious religious- beliefs could not be lawfully expelled from school because of their failure to-participate in the flag ceremonial, then the actions of the two defendants in reinstating those pupils were proper and a conviction of them should be set aside.

The views of this court expressed in Pendley v. State, supra, therefore control in the disposition of this case.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the county court of Woods county be reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss.

BAREFOOT, J., concurs. DOYLE, J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

JONES, P. J.

A. G. Zimmerman and J. W. Mc-Curley, members of the school hoard of school district No. 36 in Woods county, and both being Jehovah’s Witnesses, were charged by information filed in the county court of Woods county with unlawfully hindering and refusing to assist the teacher of said school district in the enforcement of an appropriate flag ceremonial in said public school, by reinstating certain pupils after they were suspended from said public school by the teacher for persistent violation of the school regulation in respect to the flag ceremonial as formulated by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction in Bulletin Not 146. The defendants were tried, convicted and sentenced to- pay a fine of $150 each.

Certain pupils of the school district of which the defendants were respectively the director and clerk of the school board were suspended from school for refusing to participate in the flag salute ceremony. The children refused to salute the flag because it conflicted with their religious beliefs. A controversy arose and the teacher, *268 according to Ms testimony, submitted the matter to the school board “to decide whether I was right in suspending the children, or whether the children were right.” The two defendants, constituting a majority of the school board, decided to reinstate the pupils in school who had been expelled for refusing to salute the flag and instructed the teacher' to proceed with the flag ceremonial for those who wished to participate, but to excuse those children from participating who did not wish to do so- because it conflicted with their religious beliefs:.

Although this conviction arises in a different manner from the convictions discussed by this court in the cases of Pendley v. State, 77 Okla Cr. 259, 141 P. 2d 118, and Carter-Mort v. State, 77 Okla. Cr. 269, 141 P. 2d 122, they are all dependent upon a construction of the statute empowering the State Superintendent to prescribe a proper ceremonial for teaching respect to the American flag. If, as has been held by us in two decisions above referred to, pupils with conscientious religious- beliefs could not be lawfully expelled from school because of their failure to-participate in the flag ceremonial, then the actions of the two defendants in reinstating those pupils were proper and a conviction of them should be set aside.

The views of this court expressed in Pendley v. State, supra, therefore control in the disposition of this case.

It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the county court of Woods county be reversed and remanded with instructions to dismiss.

BAREFOOT, J., concurs. DOYLE, J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1943 OK CR 92, 141 P.2d 123, 77 Okla. Crim. 266, 1943 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 34, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1943.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack