Zimmerman v. State
This text of 505 So. 2d 517 (Zimmerman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We hold that the trial court was eminently correct, upon the facts presented, in denying the motion to suppress. The marine patrol acted lawfully when it stopped the boat for a decal violation1 and when it subsequently boarded the boat for a registration check and safety inspection.2 See State v. Casal, 410 So.2d 152 (Fla.1982), cert. dismissed, 462 U.S. 637, 103 S.Ct. 3100, 77 L.Ed.2d 277 (1983); Sherman v. State, 419 So.2d 375 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
While on board, the marijuana was discovered in plain view and smell.
We, therefore, affirm the judgment and sentence.3
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
505 So. 2d 517, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 850, 1987 Fla. App. LEXIS 12087, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.