Zimmerman v. Sonnenschein
This text of 167 A.D. 896 (Zimmerman v. Sonnenschein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defense of usury is sufficiently pleaded to resist a motion to strike out the answer as frivolous. The order should he reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion denied, without costs. Present — Clarke, Laughlin, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, without costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
167 A.D. 896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-sonnenschein-nyappdiv-1915.