Zimmerman v. Rubin

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Zimmerman v. Rubin

130 Misc. 394, 223 N.Y.S. 517, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 975

CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 130 Misc. 394 (Zimmerman v. Rubin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. Rubin, 130 Misc. 394, 223 N.Y.S. 517, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 975 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover broker’s commissions on the sale of a store. The broker, who is the plaintiff, appellant, brought the parties together, and the purchaser agreed to the seller’s terms. Because of two misrepresentations made by the seller, the purchaser has been allowed to recover back the deposit which he made. The plaintiff, appellant, was not responsible for the non-completion of the transaction. Having brought a customer who was able, ready and willing to purchase on the seller s terms, he has earned and is entitled to the commission for which he sued.

Judgment reversed, with $30 costs to appellant, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $650 and costs.

All concur; present, Bi,tur, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

This is an action to recover broker’s commissions on the sale of a store. The broker, who is the plaintiff, appellant, brought the parties together, and the purchaser agreed to the seller’s terms. Because of two misrepresentations made by the seller, the purchaser has been allowed to recover back the deposit which he made. The plaintiff, appellant, was not responsible for the non-completion of the transaction. Having brought a customer who was able, ready and willing to purchase on the seller s terms, he has earned and is entitled to the commission for which he sued.

Judgment reversed, with $30 costs to appellant, and judgment directed for plaintiff for $650 and costs.

All concur; present, Bi,tur, Levy and Crain, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 Misc. 394, 223 N.Y.S. 517, 1927 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 975, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-rubin-nyappterm-1927.