Zimmerman v. Pope

2014 Ark. App. 630
CourtCourt of Appeals of Arkansas
DecidedNovember 5, 2014
DocketCV-14-525
StatusPublished

This text of 2014 Ark. App. 630 (Zimmerman v. Pope) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimmerman v. Pope, 2014 Ark. App. 630 (Ark. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 630

ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION EN BANC No. CV-14-525

GAYLE D. ZIMMERMAN Opinion Delivered November 5, 2014 APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE ASHLEY V. COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT [NO. DR-2013-53-2]

SAMUEL B. POPE HONORABLE ROBERT WILSON APPELLEE GARRETT, JUDGE

ORDER SET ASIDE; APPELLANT’S BRIEF DUE IN 30 DAYS

PER CURIAM

On September 24, 2014, we issued an order granting appellant’s motion to supplement

the record and to extend the time to file her brief in this case. We also ordered her to clarify

her notice of appeal within ten days from the date of the order. We then issued writs to the

clerk and court reporters of the Ashley County Circuit Court ordering them to certify to us

a complete transcript of the record, as appellant had suggested in her motion to us that a

complete record had not been filed.

We have received appellant’s “Amended Clarification of Notice of Appeal,” appellee’s

response thereto, and appellant’s reply to appellee’s response. We have also received an

affidavit from the Ashley County Circuit Clerk indicating that one of the orders that appellant

requested be included in the record was from another case, not the case appealed herein. Cite as 2014 Ark. App. 630

Finally, we have received letters from the Ashley County court reporters regarding our writ,

our request for additional transcript material, and their statements concerning appellant’s lack

of payment. Upon further review of the pleadings and other documents filed in this case to

date, we set aside our previous order of September 24, 2014. We pass any issues remaining

to be resolved to the three-judge panel assigned to the case after briefs have been submitted.

Appellant’s brief is due within 30 days from the date of this order.

Gayle D. Zimmerman, pro se appellant.

Byrd Law Firm, P.A., by: John Richard Byrd, Sr., for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2014 Ark. App. 630, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-pope-arkctapp-2014.