Zimmerman v. Hauxhurst Land Co.

83 A. 911, 83 N.J.L. 640, 54 Vroom 640, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 204
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedJune 20, 1912
StatusPublished

This text of 83 A. 911 (Zimmerman v. Hauxhurst Land Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimmerman v. Hauxhurst Land Co., 83 A. 911, 83 N.J.L. 640, 54 Vroom 640, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1912).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

• This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with that of Dierkes v. Hauxhurst Land Company, decided at 'the present term. For the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion filed in that case, ante p. 624, the judgment now under review will be affinned.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, Voortiees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogbrt, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
83 A. 911, 83 N.J.L. 640, 54 Vroom 640, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 204, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-hauxhurst-land-co-nj-1912.