Zimmerman v. Hauxhurst Land Co.

83 A. 911, 83 N.J.L. 640, 54 Vroom 640, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 204
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 20, 1912·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

• This case was consolidated for the purpose of trial with that of Dierkes v. Hauxhurst Land Company, decided at 'the present term. For the reasons stated in the per curiam opinion filed in that case, ante p. 624, the judgment now under review will be affinned.

For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Trenchakd, Parker, Bergen, Voortiees, Minturn, Kalisch, Bogbrt, Yredenburgi-i, Yroom, Congdon, White, Treacy, JJ. 15.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zimmerman v. Hauxhurst Land Co., 83 A. 911, 83 N.J.L. 640, 54 Vroom 640, 1912 N.J. LEXIS 204 (N.J. 1912).

83 A. 911 (Zimmerman v. Hauxhurst Land Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.