Zimmerman v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Zimmerman v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance

708 A.2d 99

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedApril 14, 1998

DocketPetition No. 617 W.D. Alloc. Dkt. 1997

StatusPublished

This text of 708 A.2d 99 (Zimmerman v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. Harleysville Mutual Insurance, 708 A.2d 99 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, but limited to the issue of:

Whether the trial court erred in not adopting the “loss in progress” theory of insurance coverage which would have required the insurer providing insurance at the commencement of the damage to compensate its insured for all of the damage even though the policy of insurance had expired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 14th day of April, 1998, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is granted, but limited to the issue of:

Whether the trial court erred in not adopting the “loss in progress” theory of insurance coverage which would have required the insurer providing insurance at the commencement of the damage to compensate its insured for all of the damage even though the policy of insurance had expired.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

708 A.2d 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-harleysville-mutual-insurance-pa-1998.