Zimmerman v. Gravos

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zimmerman v. Gravos

205 A.D.2d 621, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 13, 1994

StatusPublished

This text of 205 A.D.2d 621 (Zimmerman v. Gravos) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. Gravos, 205 A.D.2d 621, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated December 7, 1992, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that there were issues of fact as to whether the injured plaintiff suffered a "serious injury” within the meaning of the Insurance Law (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017; Bates v Ferrara, 171 AD2d 635). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Brucia, J.), dated December 7, 1992, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that there were issues of fact as to whether the injured plaintiff suffered a "serious injury” within the meaning of the Insurance Law (see, Insurance Law § 5102 [d]; Lopez v Senatore, 65 NY2d 1017; Bates v Ferrara, 171 AD2d 635). Mangano, P. J., Balletta, O’Brien, Hart and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

205 A.D.2d 621, 614 N.Y.S.2d 286, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6207, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-gravos-nyappdiv-1994.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack