Zimmerman v. Fraternal Reserve Ass'n

166 N.W. 5, 166 Wis. 446, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 13
CourtWisconsin Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 5, 1918
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 166 N.W. 5 (Zimmerman v. Fraternal Reserve Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Wisconsin Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimmerman v. Fraternal Reserve Ass'n, 166 N.W. 5, 166 Wis. 446, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 13 (Wis. 1918).

Opinion

Winslow, C. J.

In this case we are satisfied that a ver-' diet for the defendant should have been directed. The undisputed facts conclusively prove suicide. They need not he restated here. The proofs of death, which stated that the deceased died by his own hand, were unexplained, and made a prima facie case of suicide. Voelkel v. Supreme Tent K. M. W. 116 Wis. 202, 92 N. W. 1104. Not only was there nothing to rebut the prima facie case thus made, but there was much to strengthen it. There was no disorder in the death room, no evidence of struggle, no robbery, no indication of any kind pointing to death by violence or accident, while every fact is consistent'with and points to suicide.

The sealed letter in his pocket addressed to his wife, who was but a few blocks away and living with him as his wife, taken in connection with the fact that she would not permit its contents to be disclosed, may well be regarded as strongly confirmatory of the fact of suicide. ' Under the circumstances presented by the evidence, not only is the presumption against suicide completely overthrown, but the fact of suicide seems to us to be established to a reasonable certainty. Hart v. Fraternal Alliance, 108 Wis. 490, 84 N. W. 851; Voelkel v. Supreme Tent K. M. W., supra.

By the Court. — Judgment reversed, and action remanded with directions to dismiss the complaint.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Supreme Forest Woodmen Circle v. Garcia
103 S.W.2d 1108 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1937)
Tobin v. National Casualty Co.
219 P. 482 (California Court of Appeal, 1923)
Anderson v. Royal Highlanders
195 Iowa 1252 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1923)
Thornell v. Missouri State Life Ins.
249 S.W. 203 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 N.W. 5, 166 Wis. 446, 1918 Wisc. LEXIS 13, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-fraternal-reserve-assn-wis-1918.