Zimmerman v. Enterprise Wall Paper Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zimmerman v. Enterprise Wall Paper Manufacturing Co.

10 A.D.2d 891, 202 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10416

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 27, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 10 A.D.2d 891 (Zimmerman v. Enterprise Wall Paper Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. Enterprise Wall Paper Manufacturing Co., 10 A.D.2d 891, 202 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10416 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover salesman’s commissions and damages for the breach of an employment contract, the appeals are (1) by plaintiff, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 17, 1959, as grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action and denies plaintiff’s motion to strike the defense of res judicata insofar as it is pleaded in answer to said first cause of action; and (2) by defendant, from so much of the same order as denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action and grants plaintiff’s motion to strike the defense of res judicata insofar as it is pleaded in answer to said second cause of action. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover salesman’s commissions and damages for the breach of an employment contract, the appeals are (1) by plaintiff, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered September 17, 1959, as grants defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the first cause of action and denies plaintiff’s motion to strike the defense of res judicata insofar as it is pleaded in answer to said first cause of action; and (2) by defendant, from so much of the same order as denies defendant’s motion to dismiss the second cause of action and grants plaintiff’s motion to strike the defense of res judicata insofar as it is pleaded in answer to said second cause of action. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, without costs. No opinion. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A.D.2d 891, 202 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10416, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-enterprise-wall-paper-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1960.