Zimmerman v. Dinapoli, Unpublished Decision (3-7-2005)
This text of 2005 Ohio 937 (Zimmerman v. Dinapoli, Unpublished Decision (3-7-2005)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
{¶ 2} It is well established that the denial of a motion for summary judgment is not a final appealable order. State ex rel. Overmeyer v.Walinski (1966),
{¶ 3} Additionally, an order that is not final cannot be rendered final merely by adding Civ.R. 54(B) language. Noble v. Colwell (1989),
{¶ 4} Accordingly, the trial court's addition of Civ.R. 54(B) language did not make the otherwise nonfinal order final in this case. Appellant can appeal the trial court's decision once it renders a final appealable order.
{¶ 5} Based upon the foregoing analysis, this appeal is hereby sua sponte dismissed for lack of a final appealable order.
{¶ 6} Appeal dismissed.
Grendell, J., Rice, J., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2005 Ohio 937, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-dinapoli-unpublished-decision-3-7-2005-ohioctapp-2005.