Home/Supreme Court/Zimmerman v. Corson County

Zimmerman v. Corson County

249 U.S. 593, 39 S. Ct. 390
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 5, 1919·No. No. 335·Published

Opinion

Per curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of: (1) §237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of September 6, 1916, c. 448, 39 Stat. 726. (2) Consolidated Turnpike Co. [594] v. Norfolk, &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 326, 334; St. Louis & San Francisco R. R. Co. v. Shepherd, 240 U. S. 240, 241; Bilby v. Stewart, 246 U. S. 255, 257.

Mr. William G. Porter for plaintiff in error. Mr. Clarence C. Caldwell for defendants in error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zimmerman v. Corson County, 249 U.S. 593, 39 S. Ct. 390 (1919).

249 U.S. 593 (Zimmerman v. Corson County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk & Ocean View Railway Co.
228 U.S. 326 (Supreme Court, 1913)
St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. Shepherd
240 U.S. 240 (Supreme Court, 1916)
Bilby v. Stewart
246 U.S. 255 (Supreme Court, 1918)