Zimmerman v. City of Coral Gables

194 So. 617, 145 Fla. 533, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 977
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 9, 1940·Published

Opinions

*534 Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Wi-iitfield and Mr. Justice Ci-iapman are of the opinion that the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Thomas are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the said judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court,' the decree should be affirmed; therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged, under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Wi-iitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zimmerman v. City of Coral Gables, 194 So. 617, 145 Fla. 533, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 977 (Fla. 1940).

194 So. 617 (Zimmerman v. City of Coral Gables) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)