Zimmerman v. City of Coral Gables

194 So. 617, 145 Fla. 533, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 977
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedFebruary 9, 1940
StatusPublished

This text of 194 So. 617 (Zimmerman v. City of Coral Gables) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimmerman v. City of Coral Gables, 194 So. 617, 145 Fla. 533, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 977 (Fla. 1940).

Opinions

*534 Per Curiam.

In this cause Mr. Chief Justice Terrell, Mr. Justice Wi-iitfield and Mr. Justice Ci-iapman are of the opinion that the judgment of the circuit court should be reversed, while Mr. Justice Brown, Mr. Justice Buford and Mr. Justice Thomas are of the opinion that the judgment should be affirmed. When the members of the Supreme Court, sitting six members in a body and after full consultation, it appears that the members of the Court are permanently and equally divided in opinion as to whether the said judgment should be affirmed or reversed, and there is no prospect of an immediate change in the personnel of the Court,' the decree should be affirmed; therefore, it is considered, ordered and adjudged, under the authority of State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung, 47 Fla. 224, 37 So. R. 51, that the judgment of the circuit court in this cause be and the same is hereby affirmed.

Affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Wi-iitfield, Brown, Buford, Chapman and Thomas, J. J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Hampton v. McClung
47 Fla. 224 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
194 So. 617, 145 Fla. 533, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 977, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-city-of-coral-gables-fla-1940.