Zimmerman v. Builders Board

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Zimmerman v. Builders Board

616 P.2d 1186, 48 Or. App. 236, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3836

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedSeptember 22, 1980

DocketNo. 1622, CA 15984

StatusPublished

This text of 616 P.2d 1186 (Zimmerman v. Builders Board) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmerman v. Builders Board, 616 P.2d 1186, 48 Or. App. 236, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3836 (Or. Ct. App. 1980).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner, a builder, seeks review of an order by the Builders Board that he pay claimant $3,500 as damages for breach of a construction contract. Assuming that there was a valid contract between the builder and the claimant and that the builder breached that contract, there was no evidence to support a conclusion that $3,500 was the reasonable and necessary consequence of that breach. Midwest Fabrication v. Woodex, Inc., 40 Or App 675, 596 P2d 581, rev den (1979).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Petitioner, a builder, seeks review of an order by the Builders Board that he pay claimant $3,500 as damages for breach of a construction contract. Assuming that there was a valid contract between the builder and the claimant and that the builder breached that contract, there was no evidence to support a conclusion that $3,500 was the reasonable and necessary consequence of that breach. Midwest Fabrication v. Woodex, Inc., 40 Or App 675, 596 P2d 581, rev den (1979).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

616 P.2d 1186, 48 Or. App. 236, 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 3836, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-builders-board-orctapp-1980.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack