Zimmerman v. Birnbaum
This text of 230 A.D.2d 674 (Zimmerman v. Birnbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered August 19, 1996, which confirmed the report of the Special Referee, unanimously affirmed on the decision of Shainswit, J. and the report of the Special Referee, without costs and disbursements.
We note, as stipulated to, that the respondent had no knowledge of the failure of the Notary Public to extend his validation. Nor do we find that anyone on the candidate’s behalf [675]*675knew anything about the Notary’s failure to extend his commission (see, Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 180 AD2d 479, mod 81 NY2d 161).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D.2d 674, 646 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8712, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-v-birnbaum-nyappdiv-1996.