Zimmerman v. Birnbaum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zimmerman v. Birnbaum

230 A.D.2d 674, 646 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8712

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided August 22, 1996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered August 19, 1996, which confirmed the report of the Special Referee, unanimously affirmed on the decision of Shainswit, J. and the report of the Special Referee, without costs and disbursements.

We note, as stipulated to, that the respondent had no knowledge of the failure of the Notary Public to extend his validation. Nor do we find that anyone on the candidate’s behalf [675] knew anything about the Notary’s failure to extend his commission (see, Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 180 AD2d 479, mod 81 NY2d 161).

Concur — Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Beatrice Shainswit, J.), entered August 19, 1996, which confirmed the report of the Special Referee, unanimously affirmed on the decision of Shainswit, J. and the report of the Special Referee, without costs and disbursements.

We note, as stipulated to, that the respondent had no knowledge of the failure of the Notary Public to extend his validation. Nor do we find that anyone on the candidate’s behalf [675] knew anything about the Notary’s failure to extend his commission (see, Parks v Leahey & Johnson, 180 AD2d 479, mod 81 NY2d 161).

Concur — Wallach, J. P., Rubin, Williams and Andrias, JJ.

Zimmerman v. Birnbaum, 230 A.D.2d 674, 646 N.Y.S.2d 618, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8712 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

230 A.D.2d 674 (Zimmerman v. Birnbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related