Zimmerman & Co. v. Somerset Mutual Fire Insurance

91 Pa. Super. 421, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 208
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedApril 13, 1927
DocketAppeal 123
StatusPublished

This text of 91 Pa. Super. 421 (Zimmerman & Co. v. Somerset Mutual Fire Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zimmerman & Co. v. Somerset Mutual Fire Insurance, 91 Pa. Super. 421, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 208 (Pa. Ct. App. 1927).

Opinion

Per Curiam,

This appeal is from judgment entered in the court below pursuant to authority conferred in a case stated *422 submitted by tbe parties, for tbe opinion of that court. Neither party reserved the right to appeal in the event of an adverse judgment.

It has long been the law that no appeal lies from a judgment so entered unless the right to appeal is reserved in the case stated: Fuller v. Trevoir, 8 S. & R. 529; Hughes’ Admr. v. Peaslee, 50 Pa. 257; Commonwealth v. Callahan, 153 Pa. 625. As the parties agreed to be bound by the judgment entered below, this court cannot entertain the appeal. We may say, however, that we have examined the case on its merits and find it properly decided.

The appeal quashed because no right to appeal was reserved.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hughes's Administrator v. Peaslee
50 Pa. 257 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1865)
Commonwealth v. Callahan
25 A. 1000 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 Pa. Super. 421, 1927 Pa. Super. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmerman-co-v-somerset-mutual-fire-insurance-pasuperct-1927.