Zimmer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n
927 N.W.2d 250, 503 Mich. 1038
This text of 927 N.W.2d 250 (Zimmer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Zimmer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n, 927 N.W.2d 250, 503 Mich. 1038 (Mich. 2019).
Opinion
On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and *251relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion to appoint counsel is DENIED.
Cavanagh, J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
927 N.W.2d 250, 503 Mich. 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmer-v-attorney-grievance-commn-mich-2019.