Zimmer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n

927 N.W.2d 250, 503 Mich. 1038
Michigan Supreme Court·Decided May 28, 2019·No. SC: 159143·Published

Opinion

On order of the Court, the complaint for superintending control is considered, and *251relief is DENIED, because the Court is not persuaded that it should grant the requested relief. The motion to appoint counsel is DENIED.

Cavanagh, J., did not participate due to her prior service as a member of the Attorney Grievance Commission.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Zimmer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n, 927 N.W.2d 250, 503 Mich. 1038 (Mich. 2019).

927 N.W.2d 250 (Zimmer v. Attorney Grievance Comm'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.