Zimmer-Steinhebel v. Comcast Advertising Sales, Inc.

Sixth Circuit

Zimmer-Steinhebel v. Comcast Advertising Sales, Inc.

139 F. App'x 703

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedAugust 2, 2005

DocketNo. 04-1790

StatusPublished

This text of 139 F. App'x 703 (Zimmer-Steinhebel v. Comcast Advertising Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimmer-Steinhebel v. Comcast Advertising Sales, Inc., 139 F. App'x 703 (6th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer Zimmer-Steinhebel appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Comcast Advertising Sales, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Brent Graves, [704]*704Corky Davis, and Marilyn Sclafani. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Jennifer Zimmer-Steinhebel appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Comcast Advertising Sales, Inc., Comcast Corporation, Brent Graves, [704]*704Corky Davis, and Marilyn Sclafani. After reviewing the record, the parties’ briefs, and the applicable law, this court determines that no jurisprudential purpose would be served by a panel opinion and affirms the district court’s decision for the reasons stated in that court’s opinion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

139 F. App'x 703, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimmer-steinhebel-v-comcast-advertising-sales-inc-ca6-2005.