Zimit v. Chaitman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Zimit v. Chaitman

178 A.D. 906

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 15, 1917

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 178 A.D. 906 (Zimit v. Chaitman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Zimit v. Chaitman, 178 A.D. 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, demurrer overruled, and motion denied, without costs here or below, upon the ground that matters should not be imported into the complaint upon the theory of judicial notice of the condition of the record in the register’s office, nor should a motion to strike out allegations in the answer be based upon such [907]*907assumed judicial cognizance. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the County Court of Kings county reversed, demurrer overruled, and motion denied, without costs here or below, upon the ground that matters should not be imported into the complaint upon the theory of judicial notice of the condition of the record in the register’s office, nor should a motion to strike out allegations in the answer be based upon such [907]*907assumed judicial cognizance. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Mills, Rich and Putnam, JJ., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 A.D. 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zimit-v-chaitman-nyappdiv-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack