Ziman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
This text of 557 N.E.2d 112 (Ziman v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated in the memorandum of the Appellate Division (153 AD2d 489). We add only that, in view of the unrefuted evidence of hardship, including two unchallenged audit reports prepared by DHCR’s own Accounting Division, it was not improper for the Appellate Division to remit the matter to DHCR with instructions to grant the petition.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
557 N.E.2d 112, 76 N.Y.2d 727, 557 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1990 N.Y. LEXIS 1273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ziman-v-new-york-state-division-of-housing-community-renewal-ny-1990.