Zima v. Morsa Realty Co.
This text of 262 A.D. 915 (Zima v. Morsa Realty Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage or for judgment declaring that an original bond and mortgage was operative despite the subsequent execution and delivery of an extension agreement reducing the amount of principal and the rate of interest, judgment, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
262 A.D. 915, 29 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zima-v-morsa-realty-co-nyappdiv-1941.