Zima v. Morsa Realty Co.
262 A.D. 915, 29 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6461
Opinion
In an action to foreclose a mortgage or for judgment declaring that an original bond and mortgage was operative despite the subsequent execution and delivery of an extension agreement reducing the amount of principal and the rate of interest, judgment, in so far as appealed from, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Ho opinion. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Zima v. Morsa Realty Co., 262 A.D. 915, 29 N.Y.S.2d 722, 1941 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6461 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1941).
262 A.D. 915 (Zima v. Morsa Realty Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.