Ziluck v. Ziluck

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Ziluck v. Ziluck

12 A.D.2d 764, 209 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12953

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 31, 1961·Published

Opinion

Judgment entered on February 24, 1960, dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. At the opening of the trial the court stated: “ Counsel have agreed here to submit this case to the court on an agreed statement of facts.” The record fails to set forth the facts agreed upon and -it appears that material facts are in dispute. On this record there is no evidentiary basis for the judgment. The record, incomplete as it is, suggests the feasibility of a trial of the issues raised by the pleadings. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ. [23 Misc 2d 323.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment entered on February 24, 1960, dismissing the complaint, unanimously reversed, on the law and on the facts and a new trial ordered, with costs to abide the event. At the opening of the trial the court stated: “ Counsel have agreed here to submit this case to the court on an agreed statement of facts.” The record fails to set forth the facts agreed upon and -it appears that material facts are in dispute. On this record there is no evidentiary basis for the judgment. The record, incomplete as it is, suggests the feasibility of a trial of the issues raised by the pleadings. Concur — Botein, P. J., Rabin, Valente, McNally and Stevens, JJ. [23 Misc 2d 323.]

Ziluck v. Ziluck, 12 A.D.2d 764, 209 N.Y.S.2d 1008, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12953 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

12 A.D.2d 764 (Ziluck v. Ziluck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related