Zilbert v. Blakely

132 N.W. 1135, 115 Minn. 537, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 908
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedOctober 6, 1911
DocketNos. 17,266—(39)
StatusPublished

This text of 132 N.W. 1135 (Zilbert v. Blakely) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zilbert v. Blakely, 132 N.W. 1135, 115 Minn. 537, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 908 (Mich. 1911).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

This action was brought to recover damages for the claimed destruction, by the defendant’s sheep and other stock, of hay and grass growing on plaintiff’s. [538]*538land. Upon the trial the plaintiff obtained a verdict for ten dollars. Thereafter, •on defendant’s motion, the court ordered judgment in defendant’s favor, notwithstanding the verdict. The case is brought to this court on appeal from that order.

An examination of the evidence discloses that the plaintiff had sowed timothy and clover seed in the spring of 1910, while snow was on the ground, on ten acres -of newly-cleared and broken land. The land was unfenced and was thereafter over-run by defendant’s stock at times during the spring and early summer, and the injury claimed resulted therefrom. The evidence wholly failed to show any substantial growth of hay on the land at the time of the claimed injury, or any destruction of hay or grass occurring thereon, and it does not appear that any substantial damage could be established upon a new trial.

In this state of the testimony the order appealed from was justified.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
132 N.W. 1135, 115 Minn. 537, 1911 Minn. LEXIS 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zilbert-v-blakely-minn-1911.